Governance Architecture for Alternative Asset Managers

Governance is the foundation.
Everything else depends on it.

Felmet Advisory helps alternative asset managers design operating models, governance frameworks, and execution systems that allow firms to scale with clarity, control, and speed — across investment, operations, legal, compliance, and the infrastructure that connects them.

Work often begins in areas like entity governance or investment processes, but extends across the broader platform — including how teams operate, how decisions are made, and how systems are structured to support scale.

Felmet Advisory also works alongside governance and technology platforms to ensure operating models are clearly defined and aligned before implementation — improving adoption, reducing rework, and enabling systems to function effectively in practice.

Every engagement starts with understanding how your platform actually operates today.

Discuss Your Situation
Scroll to explore

Governance complexity is the constraint on scale — and on AI adoption.

Technology and AI do not resolve governance fragmentation. They expose it. Governance architecture must be defined before systems can be implemented and scaled effectively.

This typically shows up in a few consistent ways:

  • Governance responsibilities are split across legal, compliance, investment, and operations without clear ownership or escalation paths
  • Entity governance and investment processes evolve with inconsistent ownership, workflows, and data models, driving fragmentation across the platform
  • Decision authority, approval workflows, and governing documentation are inconsistent or undefined
  • Technology platforms — entity management, investment monitoring, AI tools — require defined governance architecture to function effectively
  • Regulatory and LP expectations around governance, documentation, and accountability continue to increase

This work sits upstream of technology, reporting, and compliance execution — ensuring governance systems are structured to support effective implementation, automation, and scale.

Felmet Advisory Positioning

Governance architecture across the systems that define how your firm operates.

Felmet Advisory works across the governance systems that define how firms operate. Work is typically anchored in core systems like those below, but extends across the broader platform as needed.

Governance System 01
Entity Governance System

Covers how the firm's entity portfolio is structured, managed, and governed. Entity lifecycle processes, authority and approval frameworks, documentation architecture, signatory structures, and the operating model that connects governance execution across legal, finance, compliance, and operations — including how data is structured and maintained across systems including your internal data warehouse.

Entity Lifecycle Authority Frameworks Documentation Architecture Technology Readiness
Governance System 02
Investment Governance System

Covers how investment mandates, guidelines, and constraints are designed, operationalized, and monitored. Investment guideline architecture, CLO indenture rule operationalization, limit monitoring frameworks, pre/post-trade compliance design, and the operating model connecting investment teams, risk, compliance, and operations — including how data flows through monitoring, reporting, and control systems including your internal data warehouse.

Mandate Architecture CLO Rule Frameworks Monitoring Design Compliance Operating Model Technology Readiness

A structured path from fragmentation to coordinated governance.

Each engagement is scoped to the firm's priorities. Phases may be engaged independently or sequentially.

Engagements are structured to move from diagnosis to design to execution — ensuring governance systems are not only defined, but operationalized.

01
Phase 1
Governance Diagnostic

Structured assessment of the current governance state — processes, documentation, decision authority, ownership structures, and system readiness. Identifies fragmentation, gaps, and risk across the selected governance system.

Deliverable Current-state documentation, process and technology map, prioritized gap analysis
02
Phase 2
Architecture Design

Design of the target governance operating model — ownership structures, approval workflows, documentation frameworks, decision authority, and technology readiness. Aligned to the firm's scale, regulatory environment, and technology objectives.

Deliverable Target operating model, process maps, governance framework documentation
03
Phase 3
Implementation Advisory

Coordination with legal counsel, technology vendors, and internal teams to execute against the target model. Advisory support for platform configuration, workflow implementation, and governance operationalization.

Deliverable Governance architecture that is documented, operational, and technology-enabled

Firms typically engage at inflection points — when growth, complexity, or change exposes gaps in how the platform operates.

01
Technology Implementation

Preparing to implement a governance or investment platform and need the operating model clearly defined first.

02
Scaling Across Funds or Jurisdictions

Expanding strategies or jurisdictions where existing governance frameworks are insufficient for the new level of complexity.

03
Operationalizing Complex Mandates

Implementing complex mandates — CLO indenture rules, investment guidelines, or structured constraints — requiring systematic operationalization.

04
Post-Growth Fragmentation

Addressing governance fragmentation after rapid growth across entity structures, investment compliance, or operational processes.

05
Regulatory Pressure

Responding to SEC, LP, or board expectations around governance, documentation, accountability, and operational controls.

These situations often begin as discrete issues, but typically point to broader operating model and governance architecture challenges.

Ryan Felmet

Ryan Felmet is an operating model and governance architect focused on designing the systems that allow complex financial institutions to operate with clarity, control, and accountability.

His work spans governance architecture, investment process design, and the execution infrastructure that connects them — including entity governance, investment mandate and guideline frameworks, enterprise risk management, and cross-functional operating model design.

Felmet Advisory was established to design and align the systems that drive how firms actually operate — ensuring decision-making, accountability, and reporting are structured, scalable, and reliable, and that the technology platforms built on top of them function effectively in practice.

This work is grounded in experience building and operating these systems from within — where consistent patterns of fragmentation and misalignment emerge across firms, strategies, and jurisdictions. Felmet Advisory applies that perspective across engagements, addressing both structural challenges and the increasing complexity introduced by scale, technology, and evolving operating models.

Felmet Advisory works with a limited number of clients at a time to ensure deep engagement and high-quality outcomes. Engagements are led by Ryan directly, from diagnostic through implementation.

Cerberus Capital Management
Entity governance architecture, authority frameworks, documentation governance, and cross-functional operating model design at global scale.
Apollo Global Management
Investment guideline monitoring, CLO indenture rule architecture, and mandate operationalization across complex credit strategies.
AIG
Institutional governance and operating model design across large-scale financial services infrastructure.

Let's talk.

Most engagements begin with a conversation. If you're thinking about a governance challenge — whether it's a technology implementation, a scaling question, or a fragmentation issue you haven't fully scoped — reach out.